is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Apr 25, 2011 12:36 AM
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
Points: 30
http://www.myessentia.com/research/latex-vs-memory-foam

Reading the essentia website and came across this. there is more info on the link above, but here is the part that concerned me

1) Talalay Process
The Talalay process of making latex results in a softer feeling foam. Synthetics are always added to achieve this. 100% Natural Talalay does not exist and most Talalay on today’s market is heavily blended, if not 100% synthetic

this is not the first time I've read something about "natural latex" not being all that natural...but people who think they're buying 100% Natural Talalay are paying a premium price for what they think is a natural based product made w/no chemicals...Flobeds and SleepEz (and probably others) claim they sell "100% natural talalay"...what can we believe?

Any comments or insights from the more knowledgeable folks on here? (preferably people not working for or affliated in any way with latex mattress sales...)

thanks!

 

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #1 Apr 25, 2011 3:05 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
The Talalay process does use a little bit more chemicals than say dunlop process latex, and can never be *quite* as pure as the purest dunlop rubber around.  But the last place I would trust for latex foam information is Essentia.  Its not the additional chemicals/soaps and what not used in the Talalay process that acheives the softer feeling, it is the ratio of air/latex that is different and creates a lower density product than what is acheivable with dunlop latex.   To be fair though I am affiliated in latex mattress sales, but do carry both Talalay and Dunlop process rubbers. There are good and bad things about both processes.  

The 100% natural talalay from Latex International is certified by the Eco Institut of Germany now.  It has been 3rd party tested and it shows that there is no synthetic latex in the mix. When they claim 100% natural rubber, it means the polymer mixture, or the ratio of NR (natural rubber) to SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber).  The reason it is usually not as pure has to do with shipping/and the extra steps involved in the talalay process.  The purest rubber foam in the world is about 97% pure, there always has to be some residual sulfur in the end product, (sulfur literally forms the links and bonds between the rubber and is chemical used by Mr. Goodyear when he invented the vulcanization process for rubber). Some products have simply more residual sulfur, and zinc oxide left in the end product.  Anything over 90% pure is high quality and would be certified by Eco Institute (assuming they do not have other VOC's in the product that test higher than they allow for).

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #2 Apr 25, 2011 7:13 PM
Joined: Aug 31, 2007
Points: 793
Thank you Budgy for sharing your knowledge. I always enjoy reading your posts.
Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #3 Apr 25, 2011 11:52 PM
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
Points: 30
Interesting thanks for that info Budgy. IsTalalaly more expensive than Dunlop? I've never really checked the price differences. If Talalay is more expensive than Dunlop what is the reason? 

Also is Essentia not a trustworthy company?

 

thanks!

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #4 Apr 26, 2011 12:44 AM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
The Talalay process for making latex foam is more costly than dunlop process rubber because the equipment is more complicated and expensive.  Although this is a large generalization. The biggest cost of making rubber foam has always been the materials costs, some high quality natural dunlop rubber can be just as much or more expensive than natural talalay latex.  but its really hard to guess what a manufacturers true costs are.  The cost of talalay usually being higher stems more from the fact that it is common belief it is superior to dunlop process rubber and people are 'willing' to pay the premium.  

Dunlop rubber is denser and heavier than Talalay rubber, and therefore materials costs are always higher given that the polymer mixture is the same.  The price of processing Talalay latex is higher and than Dunlop.  Higher price does not always mean a better end product.  The most expensive latex mattresses usually have the most expensive and higher quality coverings and base systems, something that many people will not consider when doing comparison shopping.  For the most part you get what you pay for, but preference is always a big factor.  Natural dunlop rubber is realistically more supportive and longer lasting than less dense natural talalay, natural talalay can be made softer and perhaps (in the case of lower ILD's)  a little better at relieving pressure.  So its not that one is better persay than the other.  At the end of the day, the best and most expensive latex foams are truthfully all natural, there are some synthetic rubbers that exist that can outperform natural rubber in some respects, however styrene butadiene is not really one of them.  The elasticity of natural rubber is essentially what makes latex a desirable product to use in a mattress, natural rubber is significantly more elastic than synthetic latex.  Few other materials compare in this regard other than horsehair (which is even more expensive).

I don't trust Essentias information regarding latex foams as much of it is either biased heavily and or simply incorrect.  For example on their ingredients page they list styrene-butadiene as a component of natural rubber.  Styrene-butadien is quite literally what synthetic latex (in mattresses) is made out of.  They also list polyvinyl acetate as a component of natural rubber, although because this is actually a polymer material it would be tested for by companies like Eco Institut before they certify rubber, there are many latex makers that do not use this chemical in making truly natural rubber.  As a company I don't think Essentia is any more shady (in reality a lot less shady) than most mattress manufacturers.  But they really pick and choose the information they make available about their material and do not have it 3rd party tested (and publicly list the results).  

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #5 May 8, 2011 3:17 PM
Joined: Apr 20, 2011
Points: 31
I actually asked Essentia about that.  They said they hadn't seen 100% natural talalay, so it might exist but they haven't seen it.

Savvy Rest, in their blog (by Michael Penny) actually says that you can't make latex 100% natural because there will always be small amounts of processing chemicals like sulfur and some other stuff, which the latex manufacturers say are proprietary information.  He said it's really more like 95% or so, so Savvy Rest will never claim 100% in order to be fully honest.  You can find it somewhere in the blog...I think the title was very roughly along the lines of "chemicals in your mattress" but I can't remember.  I just read it yesterday but I think it was an old entry.  So, possibly that's where Essentia is getting that claim from, though they didn't cite that when I asked.

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #6 May 8, 2011 8:20 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
The article on Savvyrest' website is accurate. Essentia specifically talks about the Talalay process, implying that only Dunlop rubber can be 100% natural.  From a purity standpoint Dunlop has the potential to be of higher purity, but both processes use sulfur to vulcanize the rubber mixture.  So what they are talking about does not have to do with the sulfur, its other chemicals used in small quantities in talalay latex production...the specifics on this I am not sure.
Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #7 May 8, 2011 11:40 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
It is impossible to make latex foam without sulfur...it is literally what forms the links between the rubber molecules.  The foam is made of the same materials in either case, and this website has grossly oversimplified the process if we are trying to be really scientific. Ammonia is usually used in some small amounts in just about all latex foam production...particularly if the latex is being processed a long distance from the rubber plantations...ie, North America or Europe.  

When a rubber tree is damaged in the wild the milk of the rubber tree (latex) comes out and will actually naturally harden within a relatively short period of time.  Ammonia is typically added in large volumes in the shipping containers so that this does not happen during transport of the material.  Even a small amount is usually added even if it is processed in SE Asia.  

When it comes to sulfur content, zinc oxide, or ammonia...it has nothing to do with the process used...it has to do with vulcanizing natural rubber in general.  If you want to see the purest rubber around you have to get access to Eco Instituts test results for varying manufacturers that submit to testing.  GreenSleep and Cocolatex for example even publish these results so you can know the specific amount of sulfur content and also a super long list of VOC's that they test for.  These are both Dunlop latex foams...there is now some certified Talalay latex but none of these companies have published their results.

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #8 May 9, 2011 12:31 AM
Joined: Apr 15, 2011
Points: 163
Wow - thanks, Budgy. That helps clarify things greatly. Do you (or anyone else?) have any insight to offer as to why Talalay test results have not been published?

Thanks again! Really appreciate you sharing your knowledge with us forumers.

 

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #9 May 9, 2011 12:30 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
weewillywinky wrote:

Wow - thanks, Budgy. That helps clarify things greatly. Do you (or anyone else?) have any insight to offer as to why Talalay test results have not been published?

 

Thanks again! Really appreciate you sharing your knowledge with us forumers.

 


Its not too fair for me to speculate too much.  Most certified dunlop producers do not publish their results either, they usually just list that they have some kind of certification for 3rd party testing.

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #10 May 9, 2011 1:58 PM
Joined: Apr 16, 2011
Points: 15
To Budgy:

Budgy thanks for all the helpful posts.

Some questions from me.

1  Which latex lasts longer and which one does not sag?

Synthetic talalay or Natural talalay?

2.  what is the softest dunlop latex? who is making it?

3. For me I am having low back pains.

Should I be choosing synthetic talalay or natural talalay

or dunlop latex?

Thank you budgy

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #11 May 9, 2011 4:51 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
helpme wrote:

To Budgy:

 

Budgy thanks for all the helpful posts.

Some questions from me.

1  Which latex lasts longer and which one does not sag?

Synthetic talalay or Natural talalay?

2.  what is the softest dunlop latex? who is making it?

3. For me I am having low back pains.

Should I be choosing synthetic talalay or natural talalay

or dunlop latex?

Thank you budgy

Please do keep in mind that I can only answer these questions based on my own and my customers varied experiences.  

1.  Natural rubber is more elastic than SBR (styrene butadiene rubber).  In theory, natural rubber should last longer, other than perhaps in a land fill where it will biodegrade quickly and SBR will linger on and on.  The only latex mattresses we have ever had excessive sagging issues in were made with blended talalay (30~40% Natural, 60~70% synthetic), and to be fair all of these ones so far also had some polyfoam in the quilting layers as well.  Although there was a customer in recent history that had issues, I went to inspect the mattress.  Even though the blended talalay core was not sagging, it had softened noticeably in one area.  That particular spot the cover on the mattress was discoloured with perspiration stains, if someone is a heavy perspirer, they may want to consider having a thicker wool cover to protect the latex.  Whether the latex is natural or synthetically blended nothing will break down rubber faster than the salts in our perspiration.  

2. I really couldn't say because there are so many dunlop foam producers and I have only examined/worked with a limited # of producers.  I can say in my opinion there are some fairly soft all dunlop latex mattresses available, the 6+4 Natural rubber from Sleeptek is one.  They make the naturally organic line for thecleanbedroom.com, the Suerte organics from the denver organic mattress showroom, and I also have this product in our store in Canada.  GreenSleep Dolcezza Model in the softest configuration is usually soft enough for most people as well. Unless they want marshmallow soft.

3. Lower back pain is usually a sign that your natural posture is simply not being supported.  This can be caused by many things, it could even be the posture you keep when you are laying in bed.  Before you buy a new mattress you should always evaluate some simple things like sleeping position, perhaps your pillow is propping your upperbody up too much and causing your back to be out of alignment.  There are a couple of prevailing myths concerning mattresses.  One is that people should sleep on a firm bed...firm does seem to be good in terms of keep our posture well, although it may be lacking in comfort, it decreases bloodflow and increases sleep fragmentation.  Soft mattresses are no good either because they hammock and do not support the spine properly, in the long term in can directly lead to scoliosis.  A good mattress (regardless of materials used) is supposed to be elastic and flexible.  This way it can support your entire body without being harsh on pressure points.  Soft and firm are subjective terms, a 100 lb person laying on one mattress may find it to be 'firm' another person @ 200 lbs may find the mattress to feel 'soft'.  Elasticity is objective, measurable and scientific, natural rubber is more elastic than synthetic rubber.  So in theory the better performing material then would either be natural talalay or dunlop latex.  Perhaps a combination of the two depending on your comfort preference.  Whether you also find it worth the price premium is debateable I suppose. But in the interest of trying to be as factual as I can be, natural rubber is better performing than synthetic rubber, much in the same way that synthetic rubber will outperform brittle polyurethane foams, flexible boxsprings outperform solid boxsprings (if designed correctly), and individual coils will conform better to body shape than interactive coil types (again if designed correctly).  

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #12 May 10, 2011 5:02 PM
Location: L.A. area
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Points: 1161
I have always believed that natural latex is better than synthetic latex but now I have to question that.

I happened to be looking at a Stearns and Foster 97% latex mattress just for fun (I was really there to look at their Intellicoil pocket coils which are made from one wire twisted into a spring within a spring; very ingenious design). Anyway as I was trying out the latex mattress a representative from S&F was there and asked me if I had any questions! Boy, did I! I am sure he did not expect to encounter someone who was well-versed in latex specs and who in all honesty probably knows more about it than he did.

However, he made the claim that natural latex will NOT last as long as synthetic latex (i.e. retain it's positive properties). I said I had heard different and was skeptical. He insisted that S&F's synthetic latex would last longer than natural. I can almost believe this or at least believe it is possible, because I have also heard it said with great conviction that Talatech latex would last longer than natural latex. (Talatech is made by Latex International who also makes the best natural latex, or one of the best.)

I am not saying one way or the other, and I do not mean to pick a fight with my friend Budgy who probably has more knowledge of latex than anyone here. But I do wonder if any really conclusive tests have been done that would prove one way or the other whether synthetic latex will provide support longer than natural latex. I doubt anyone has actually proven it, or vice versa.

One thing I did want to add is that when you go around shopping for latex, you have to be very careful because a lot of salesmen in stores will pretend to know and not really know what they are talking about. And remember always that "Talalay" is a process not a type of rubber. So synthetic latex can also be Talalay or Dunlop processed. "Talalay" does not mean "natural", it can be synthetic or natural. Stearns and Foster and Simmons both claim to use Talalay latex in their mattresses but it is synthetic. Again, whether that is bad or good is debatable.

I will also note that natural latex will turn to dust if left in the sun or extreme heat, as will synthetic. I have latex which is getting very dry. Frankly I don't know if it's Talatech or natural but it is getting very dry and brittle because I have at times left it laying where sunlight reaches it and dry hot air. Budgy, have you noted that natural latex will deteriorate from being in heat and sun? Will it not then also deteriorate (but slower) inside a mattress?

This message was modified May 10, 2011 by jimsocal
Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #13 May 10, 2011 8:25 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
jimsocal wrote:

 

I have always believed that natural latex is better than synthetic latex but now I have to question that.

 

I happened to be looking at a Stearns and Foster 97% latex mattress just for fun (I was really there to look at their Intellicoil pocket coils which are made from one wire twisted into a spring within a spring; very ingenious design). Anyway as I was trying out the latex mattress a representative from S&F was there and asked me if I had any questions! Boy, did I! I am sure he did not expect to encounter someone who was well-versed in latex specs and who in all honesty probably knows more about it than he did.

However, he made the claim that natural latex will NOT last as long as synthetic latex (i.e. retain it's positive properties). I said I had heard different and was skeptical. He insisted that S&F's synthetic latex would last longer than natural. I can almost believe this or at least believe it is possible, because I have also heard it said with great conviction that Talatech latex would last longer than natural latex. (Talatech is made by Latex International who also makes the best natural latex, or one of the best.)

I am not saying one way or the other, and I do not mean to pick a fight with my friend Budgy who probably has more knowledge of latex than anyone here. But I do wonder if any really conclusive tests have been done that would prove one way or the other whether synthetic latex will provide support longer than natural latex. I doubt anyone has actually proven it, or vice versa.

One thing I did want to add is that when you go around shopping for latex, you have to be very careful because a lot of salesmen in stores will pretend to know and not really know what they are talking about. And remember always that "Talalay" is a process not a type of rubber. So synthetic latex can also be Talalay or Dunlop processed. "Talalay" does not mean "natural", it can be synthetic or natural. Stearns and Foster and Simmons both claim to use Talalay latex in their mattresses but it is synthetic. Again, whether that is bad or good is debatable.

I will also note that natural latex will turn to dust if left in the sun or extreme heat, as will synthetic. I have latex which is getting very dry. Frankly I don't know if it's Talatech or natural but it is getting very dry and brittle because I have at times left it laying where sunlight reaches it and dry hot air. Budgy, have you noted that natural latex will deteriorate from being in heat and sun? Will it not then also deteriorate (but slower) inside a mattress?


Based on the rubber samples we have had in our showroom I would say that natural rubber is more resistant to UV radiation than synthetic as well, but this is less than scientific because its not like this is controlled testing...just more an empirical observation.  But its not good for either one, in a mattress this typically shouldn't be an issue.  I just have a really hard time believing that blended rubber or synthetic rubber would be more durable given that it crumbles so easily compared to natural dunlop.  Perfection Mattress has a good group of informational videos on youtube, he had a customer that bought a 5" Natural Dunlop mattress from Sears made by GoodYear.  This particular mattress had lasted basically 50 years before they replaced it...the only thing wrong with it was the completely destroyed cover.  This is most likely an exception and certainly not the rule on how long any natural latex bed should last.  But basically what I am getting at is that natural rubber beds have been made for a long time, and we know because of how many of them have sold and that most last like 20+ years that they are an incredibly durable mattress type. We have also sold about 500 latex mattresses in the last few years, about half of them are blended talalay latex (lots of childrens mattresses though), and the other half are 100% natural, some with talalay, but most with all dunlop construction. Out of all those mattresses, we have had 3 issues with blended latex mattresses...believe me this is actually exceptionally good compared to all the S brand stuff we used to sell where warranty issues (just the ones that qualified...probably some that we dont know about as well) was in the range of 4~8% failure rate inside of 4 years.  More than half of those failures coming within 18 months of date of purchase.  To date we have no documented issues with 100% natural rubber breaking down prematurely, Talalay or Dunlop.  I am sure inevitably this data is going to change, but so far its in the lead for us based on customer complaints and documented warranty issues.  Note, this does not mean they are 100% successful in terms of comfort...just no defective products that we know of...yet.

When synthetic foam producers tell me their products will last longer...are they basing it on this kind of data?  Have they even been selling the product long enough to know how long it will last?  Phoenix had some very good information regarding why Natural Talalay latex is not currently made in the super low ILD's because of shear type force loads that could cause issues and how if natural rubber is made too low of a density it's elasticity will work against itself because of shear force (literally being stretched apart because the rubber is so flexible).  Anything above high teens in the ILD's the elasticity of natural rubber just helps it bounce back without losing firmness and the elasticity generally helps the durability.

Also knowing that UV radiation and the chemicals in our sweat are what causes rubber to break down faster than physical forces like those replicated in manufacturer testing (giant rollers beating on the foam), these kinds of claims also seem highly irrelevant to me.  What is relevant to me is real world data and experience. 

If synthetic latex was superior then why on earth would the same company blend any natural rubber into the mix at all when the cost of doing so is significantly higher?  it would be much cheaper to make the product 100% synthetically. 

Why does this company promote the blended or synthetic product to be better than the all natural when they charge basically the same for both? because they want you to buy the cheaper more profitable product. 

The last point being the main reason I still say that blended rubber is an awesome material to use in a mattress...but if the price difference is really small I would pay the premium to sleep on natural rubber. In our store the blended latex products are signifcantly less expensive than the all natural ones....so we carry both. Above and beyond all of this, is the whole chemical aspect, the resistance that natural rubber has to allergens like dust mites, moulds, bacteria....SBR is lacking these properties and at the end of the day it is a petroleum product.

This message was modified May 10, 2011 by budgy
Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #14 May 11, 2011 1:20 PM
Joined: Mar 7, 2011
Points: 66
budgy wrote:

 

 

 


Based on the rubber samples we have had in our showroom I would say that natural rubber is more resistant to UV radiation than synthetic as well, but this is less than scientific because its not like this is controlled testing...just more an empirical observation.  But its not good for either one, in a mattress this typically shouldn't be an issue.  I just have a really hard time believing that blended rubber or synthetic rubber would be more durable given that it crumbles so easily compared to natural dunlop.  Perfection Mattress has a good group of informational videos on youtube, he had a customer that bought a 5" Natural Dunlop mattress from Sears made by GoodYear.  This particular mattress had lasted basically 50 years before they replaced it...the only thing wrong with it was the completely destroyed cover.  This is most likely an exception and certainly not the rule on how long any natural latex bed should last.  But basically what I am getting at is that natural rubber beds have been made for a long time, and we know because of how many of them have sold and that most last like 20+ years that they are an incredibly durable mattress type. We have also sold about 500 latex mattresses in the last few years, about half of them are blended talalay latex (lots of childrens mattresses though), and the other half are 100% natural, some with talalay, but most with all dunlop construction. Out of all those mattresses, we have had 3 issues with blended latex mattresses...believe me this is actually exceptionally good compared to all the S brand stuff we used to sell where warranty issues (just the ones that qualified...probably some that we dont know about as well) was in the range of 4~8% failure rate inside of 4 years.  More than half of those failures coming within 18 months of date of purchase.  To date we have no documented issues with 100% natural rubber breaking down prematurely, Talalay or Dunlop.  I am sure inevitably this data is going to change, but so far its in the lead for us based on customer complaints and documented warranty issues.  Note, this does not mean they are 100% successful in terms of comfort...just no defective products that we know of...yet.

When synthetic foam producers tell me their products will last longer...are they basing it on this kind of data?  Have they even been selling the product long enough to know how long it will last?  Phoenix had some very good information regarding why Natural Talalay latex is not currently made in the super low ILD's because of shear type force loads that could cause issues and how if natural rubber is made too low of a density it's elasticity will work against itself because of shear force (literally being stretched apart because the rubber is so flexible).  Anything above high teens in the ILD's the elasticity of natural rubber just helps it bounce back without losing firmness and the elasticity generally helps the durability.

Also knowing that UV radiation and the chemicals in our sweat are what causes rubber to break down faster than physical forces like those replicated in manufacturer testing (giant rollers beating on the foam), these kinds of claims also seem highly irrelevant to me.  What is relevant to me is real world data and experience. 

If synthetic latex was superior then why on earth would the same company blend any natural rubber into the mix at all when the cost of doing so is significantly higher?  it would be much cheaper to make the product 100% synthetically. 

Why does this company promote the blended or synthetic product to be better than the all natural when they charge basically the same for both? because they want you to buy the cheaper more profitable product. 

The last point being the main reason I still say that blended rubber is an awesome material to use in a mattress...but if the price difference is really small I would pay the premium to sleep on natural rubber. In our store the blended latex products are signifcantly less expensive than the all natural ones....so we carry both. Above and beyond all of this, is the whole chemical aspect, the resistance that natural rubber has to allergens like dust mites, moulds, bacteria....SBR is lacking these properties and at the end of the day it is a petroleum product.



Budgy, I called sleepez 2 times and the same guy told me that blended talalay latex lasts longer then natural talalay latex. And laso that it contours better to your body then natural talalay latex.

Do you think SleepEz does not know what they are talking about?

This message was modified May 11, 2011 by richardp
Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #15 May 11, 2011 3:38 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
richardp wrote:

 

 



Budgy, I called sleepez 2 times and the same guy told me that blended talalay latex lasts longer then natural talalay latex. And laso that it contours better to your body then natural talalay latex.

Do you think SleepEz does not know what they are talking about?


I think that a lot of retailers have been sold the story by Latex International to believe that their talatech latex foam is somehow special.  I am not going to say its inferior by any means, just that at the end of the day these are businesses, and businesses are driven by profit more than integrity.  I have yet to see any proper scientific comparison done between blended talalay and natural talalay, 'pressure map' tests done without numbers being listed, and claims by industry representatives is all we have.  Wikipedia has more relevant information regarding the differences between SBR and NR. 

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #16 May 11, 2011 3:47 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
Heres the way I see it...if the same process is used and the cell structure is the same....then the only difference is the properties of the materials themselves. 

 

Here is one of the few objective and scientific comparions charts on different rubber compounds. 

http://www.elderrubber.com/material.htm

In all the important ways, resilience, tear resistance in particular, NR vastly outperforms SBR. 

http://www.elderrubber.com/material1.html

Here is another chart showing that NR has higher resistance to UV radiation...also note the tensile strength is highest of all rubber compounds.

This message was modified May 11, 2011 by budgy
Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #17 May 11, 2011 9:26 PM
Location: L.A. area
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Points: 1161
Budgy, thanks for all the information. I want to believe that natural latex is better and longer lasting etc. than synthetic latex. I am just kind of playing "devil's advocate" here and noting that there is a controversy about it; that the S Co's are saying their product lasts longer. Also I seem to recall that either S&F or Simmons claim their Talalay (synthetic) latex is also anti-microbial and/or dust mite resistant or dust mite free. Don't quote me on that but I seem to recall reading that in my research.

As someone pointed out, the main problem is that S&F etc. are charging natural latex prices for their synthetic product, so even though it's cheaper to produce (of that there is no doubt), they are not selling it cheaper.

Simmons claims all their foams are made in the USA and are all low-VOC and contain no cfc's, no formaldehyde, prohibited phthalates, no heavy metals, etc. They are approved by something called CertiPUR-US. It seems like a step in the right direction.

Someone told me Tempurpedic has a lot of formaldehyde. Anyone have any info on that?

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #18 May 12, 2011 1:27 PM
Joined: Mar 7, 2011
Points: 66
budgy wrote:

 


I think that a lot of retailers have been sold the story by Latex International to believe that their talatech latex foam is somehow special.  I am not going to say its inferior by any means, just that at the end of the day these are businesses, and businesses are driven by profit more than integrity.  I have yet to see any proper scientific comparison done between blended talalay and natural talalay, 'pressure map' tests done without numbers being listed, and claims by industry representatives is all we have.  Wikipedia has more relevant information regarding the differences between SBR and NR. 



I called csd and they also insisted that blended latex lasts much longer then all natural latex and that it is better.

So the scores upto now -

sleepez + csd - score 2 (both tell me that they are experts and have been doing this for long time) vs Budgy 1

 

Oh I forgot let me add slb They said the same things that sleepez and csd said - that synthetic last smuch longer so it has a 20 year warranty vs 10 year warranty for all natural latex.

 

So the scorecard now is:

SleepEz + csd + slb - 3 versus budgy 1

 

New score is then :

3-1 against budgy.

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #19 May 12, 2011 2:12 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
 

 

Thank goodness score keeping doesn't really matter....your post is about as useful as saying there are more Muslims than Hindu's in the world therefore the Muslims must be 'right'.

Let's try to be objective here...all 3 of those vendors primarily sell LI latex and/or skewed towards selling LI latex. I don't really care if you believe me or not, but exactly how much relevant data did these people give you other than "trust me im an expert and blended talalay lasts longer, WAY longer"? Also note that they are saying blended talalay last's longer than natural talalay, not natural dunlop rubber.  

I have provided you with useful data in the links to Elderrubbers website..a true polymer specialist.  Since they make just about everything themselves I would actually trust these guys to be more objective about it. Especially considering the types of applications they are providing.  If you do some more searching online you can find other latex manufacturers claiming that natural rubber is more durable than synthetic. SBR is only more resistant to petroleum based oils and similar chemicals, which in a mattress is irrelevant. 

Look at the poster in the other thread....her latex mattress is 47 years old...its natural dunlop rubber.  I suppose if blended talatech will last WAY longer then people should be able to keep these blended LI foams for much longer than 50 years but we all know thats not going to happen.  If these retailers really believed it would last longer than they should back up their claims by offer longer than the 10/10 warranties that all the natural dunlop makers give as standard.  

 

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #20 May 12, 2011 2:37 PM
Joined: Apr 20, 2011
Points: 65
richardp - what exactly are you looking for? A guarantee? I dont think one exists - at some point you have to decide what will work for you. If you feel better buying the blended, buy it. Whats the downside? I dont think there is much difference between the two unless you really prefer a "natural" product.

As other posters have mentioned, they may not yet have enough data on natural talalay process mattresses to give the same 20yr warranty you find with blended. Your warranty may never be honored anyway, so its better just to know whats in the mattress you choose. Thanks to budgy and others on this forum we are now armed with more knowledge than most of the retailers we might buy from.

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #21 May 12, 2011 2:42 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
Also Richard, I just want to apologize if my post came across as defensive.  

I am not trying to make this a pissing contest about natural being better than blended or dunlop being better than talalay....its just that the onus of proof and the burden of providing technical relevant data should be on the talalay producers....in another 30 years if we see a lot of people saying they have been sleeping on a talatech latex mattress for 45 or 50 years then I would be very happy to see that as I do tell the product myself....part of my job is not giving people unrealistic expectations because I don't want people to hold me accountable if their product doesn't last as long as its purported to.  

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #22 May 12, 2011 3:05 PM
Joined: Mar 7, 2011
Points: 66
Okay, no offense here only learning, Wish these retailers or makers could just be honest in advertising and give us the best product and just tell the truth.

 some more questions:

1. What I would like to know is which talalay latex molds better to the contours of the body? Blended or natural

2.  and I have been told that you can get only softer and exact ILDS in blended latex and not in All natural talalay latex. Like if you want 14 ILD which is the softest ILD then you can get that only in blended latex. I have also been told that in natual talalay latex ILDS are in range not in a exact number like 19 or 40 etc.

Is this all true?

Thanks.

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #23 May 12, 2011 4:17 PM
Joined: Apr 20, 2011
Points: 65
From what I've learned, regardless of the process, there is no "exact" ILD , it is measured on a specific thickness of latex - thus it is different softness depending on the thickness of the layer. Sleeplikeabear has offered 100% natural ILD in N1 softness, lower than the 20 ILD readily available on their site.

As far as what conforms better, that may be subjective. You'd have to try it out. I know I have laid on the 14 ILD Pure Latex Bliss toppers which are a 40/60 blend, and I cant imagine anything softer or more conforming.

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #24 May 12, 2011 4:22 PM
Joined: Dec 17, 2009
Points: 850
No ILD measurements are ever 100% accurate.  But it is true that with a 100% natural product there can be a variance perhaps up to a couple ILD between batches...probably hard to notice until you are on the lower ILD part of the scale...this is especially true if the supplier is not located close to the source and they might buy their hevea milk from different regions in the world depending on price at the time, for example buying half their rubber from North Africa, and when the price/time is right they buy rubber from Thailand or China.  This is one true benefit of a more synthetically based latex product, it is slightly more consistent.  

Part of the reason you will not find Natural rubber in the really low ILD's is because the tensile strength of the material is significantly higher as well as the elasticity.  

Because natural rubber is more elastic, this means that in theory given the ILD's are the same, natural rubber should conform to body shape more accurately...this is one area though where there is not a lot of data.  Probably personal feel is still the best way to tell because the chances of ever comparing a blended latex and natural latex mattress made the same exact way (talalay vs talalay, and exact ILD's, mattress covers, etc) is basically impossible.  

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #25 May 13, 2011 5:24 AM
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Joined: May 13, 2011
Points: 170
I too am in the market for a new mattress and I find lots of contradictory information out there.  A vendor who is selling X is going to tell you that X is better than Y because they are not selling Y, they are selling X!  

I recommend searching for independent information from sources that are not trying to sell you their product.  I'm sure some of the people on this list have lots of experience selling a wide variety of mattresses and I would trust them as much as I trust what I read at buymymattressitsthebestonemade.com.  I've been lurking for a few months and budgy has provided some links to independent sources of information.

Personally, I want an earth and people friendly mattress, so natural latex for me.

YMMV

Re: is this true "100% Natural Talalay does not exist"????
Reply #26 May 13, 2011 9:18 AM
Joined: May 13, 2011
Points: 1
This is an interesting thread. We recently purchased a memory foam mattress and HATE it. They may be good for some people but I think most might not like the way memory foam sleeps. Felt like everytime you rolled over, you rolled up a hill and very hot. Tempurpedic does such aggressive marketing, I'm not sure people really like what they end up with or understand the trade offs.

We shopped around and found a Verlo mattress that had a huge talalay latex foam section on top. The mattress, a Verlo grandeur elite, is an innerspring mattress, double sided with 3 inches on top and 3 inches on bottom. MUCH better sleeping mattress. Much cooler and we really liked that Verlo can adjust the mattress making it harder or softer over time. All in all, I'd look for a mattress like this one rather than a pure foam mattress of either type of foam. 

Also like that the latex foam seems to sleep cooler than the memory foam bed. We moved the memory foam bed to a guest room.

Recent Posts